BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UC Irvine//CML Seminars//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Evaluating Foundational Models Using Insights from Their Pretr
 aining Data
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:20070311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:20071104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:2024-11-25-yasaman-razeghi@cml.ics.uci.edu
DTSTAMP:20241125T000000Z
SEQUENCE:57690
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20241125T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20241125T140000
SUMMARY:[CML Seminar] Yasaman Razeghi: Evaluating Foundational Models Using
  Insights from Their Pretraining Data
LOCATION:Donald Bren Hall 4011
DESCRIPTION:Yasaman Razeghi\, PhD Student\, Department of Computer Science\
 , University of California\, Irvine\n\nTitle: Evaluating Foundational Mode
 ls Using Insights from Their Pretraining Data\n\nAbstract: Foundational mo
 dels have demonstrated exceptional performance on established academic ben
 chmarks\, often narrowing the gap between human reasoning and artificial i
 ntelligence. While the success of these models is widely attributed to the
 ir scale\, the critical role of pretraining data in shaping their capabili
 ties and limitations is often acknowledged but rarely studied. In this tal
 k\, I will argue that understanding the true performance of foundational m
 odels requires going beyond conventional benchmark testing. In particular\
 , incorporating insights from their pretraining data is essential for comp
 rehensively evaluating and interpreting the models' capabilities and limit
 ations. I show that while models often excel in benchmark settings\, they 
 can fail on basic\, trivial reasoning tasks\, raising concerns about their
  true robustness. This work cautions against overly optimistic interpretat
 ions of models' abilities based on canonical evaluation results.\n\nhttps:
 //cml.ics.uci.edu/seminars/2024-11-25-yasaman-razeghi
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<html><body><b>Yasaman Razeghi</b>\, PhD Stude
 nt\, Department of Computer Science\, University of California\, Irvine<br
 ><br><b>Title:</b> Evaluating Foundational Models Using Insights from Thei
 r Pretraining Data<br><br><b>Abstract:</b> Foundational models have demons
 trated exceptional performance on established academic benchmarks\, often 
 narrowing the gap between human reasoning and artificial intelligence. Whi
 le the success of these models is widely attributed to their scale\, the c
 ritical role of pretraining data in shaping their capabilities and limitat
 ions is often acknowledged but rarely studied. In this talk\, I will argue
  that understanding the true performance of foundational models requires g
 oing beyond conventional benchmark testing. In particular\, incorporating 
 insights from their pretraining data is essential for comprehensively eval
 uating and interpreting the models' capabilities and limitations. I show t
 hat while models often excel in benchmark settings\, they can fail on basi
 c\, trivial reasoning tasks\, raising concerns about their true robustness
 . This work cautions against overly optimistic interpretations of models' 
 abilities based on canonical evaluation results.<br><br><a href="https://c
 ml.ics.uci.edu/seminars/2024-11-25-yasaman-razeghi">https://cml.ics.uci.ed
 u/seminars/2024-11-25-yasaman-razeghi</a></body></html>
URL:https://cml.ics.uci.edu/seminars/2024-11-25-yasaman-razeghi
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
