Some believe that maximum likelihood is incompatible with high-quality image generation. We provide counter-evidence: diffusion models with SOTA FIDs (e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11093) are actually optimized with the ELBO, with very simple data augmentation (additive noise). First, we show that diffusion models in the literature are optimized with various objectives that are special cases of a weighted loss, where the weighting function specifies the weight per noise level. Uniform weighting corresponds to maximizing the ELBO, a principled approximation of maximum likelihood. In current practice diffusion models are optimized with non-uniform weighting due to better results in terms of sample quality. In this work we expose a direct relationship between the weighted loss (with any weighting) and the ELBO objective. We show that the weighted loss can be written as a weighted integral of ELBOs, with one ELBO per noise level. If the weighting function is monotonic, as in some SOTA models, then the weighted loss is a likelihood-based objective: it maximizes the ELBO under simple data augmentation, namely Gaussian noise perturbation. Our main contribution is a deeper theoretical understanding of the diffusion objective, but we also performed some experiments comparing monotonic with non-monotonic weightings, finding that monotonic weighting performs competitively with the best published results.

Bio: I do research on principled and scalable methods for machine learning, with a focus on generative models. My contributions include the Variational Autoencoder (VAE), the Adam optimizer, Glow, and Variational Diffusion Models, but please see Scholar for a more complete list. I obtained a PhD (cum laude) from University of Amsterdam in 2017, and was part of the founding team of OpenAI in 2015. Before that, I co-founded Advanza which got acquired in 2016. My formal name is Diederik, but have the Frysian nickname Durk (pronounced like Dirk). I currently live in the San Francisco Bay area.

While large deep learning models have become increasingly accurate, concerns about their (lack of) interpretability have taken a center stage. In response, a growing subfield on interpretability and analysis of these models has emerged. While hundreds of techniques have been proposed to “explain” predictions of models, what aims these explanations serve and how they ought to be evaluated are often unstated. In this talk, I will present a framework to quantify the value of explanations, along with specific applications in a variety of contexts. I would end with some of my thoughts on evaluating large language models and the rationales they generate.

Bio: Danish Pruthi is an incoming assistant professor at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore. He received his Ph.D. from the School of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University, where he was advised by Graham Neubig and Zachary Lipton. He is broadly interested in the areas of natural language processing and deep learning, with a focus on model interpretability. He completed his bachelors degree in computer science from BITS Pilani, Pilani. He has spent time doing research at Google AI, Facebook AI Research, Microsoft Research, Amazon AI and IISc. He is also a recipient of the Siebel Scholarship and the CMU Presidential Fellowship. His legal name is only Danish—a cause of airport quagmires and, in equal parts, funny anecdotes.

As the strengths of large language models (LLMs) have become prominent, so too have their weaknesses. A glaring weakness of LLMs is their penchant for generating false, biased, or misleading claims in a phenomena broadly referred to as “hallucinations”. Most LLMs also do not ground their generations to any source, exacerbating this weakness. To enable attribution while still preserving all the powerful advantages of LLMs, we propose RARR (Retrofit Attribution using Research and Revision), a system that 1) automatically retrieves evidence to support the output of any LLM followed by 2) post-editing the output to fix any information that contradicts the retrieved evidence while preserving the original output as much as possible. When applied to the output of several state-of-the-art LLMs on a diverse set of generation tasks, we find that RARR significantly improves attribution.

Bio: Anthony Chen is a final-year doctoral student advised by Sameer Singh. He is broadly interested in how we can evaluate the limits of large language models and design efficient methods to address their deficiencies. Recently, his research has been focused on tackling the pernicious problem of attribution and hallucinations in large language models and making them more reliable to use.

The causal revolution has spurred interest in understanding complex relationships in various fields. Under a general causal graph, the exposure may have a direct effect on the outcome and also an indirect effect regulated by a set of mediators. An analysis of causal effects that interprets the causal mechanism contributed through mediators is hence challenging but on demand. In this talk, we introduce a new statistical framework to comprehensively characterize causal effects with multiple mediators, namely, ANalysis Of Causal Effects (ANOCE). Built upon such causal impact learning, we focus on two emerging challenges in causal relation learning, heterogeneity and spuriousness. To characterize the heterogeneity, we first conceptualize heterogeneous causal graphs (HCGs) by generalizing the causal graphical model with confounder-based interactions and multiple mediators. In practice, only a small number of variables in the graph are relevant for the outcomes of interest. As a result, causal estimation with the full causal graph — especially given limited data — could lead to many falsely discovered, spurious variables that may be highly correlated with but have no causal impact on the target outcome. We propose to learn a class of necessary and sufficient causal graphs (NSCG) that only contain causally relevant variables by utilizing the probabilities of causation. Across empirical studies of simulated and real data applications, we show that the proposed algorithms outperform existing ones and can reveal true heterogeneous and non-spurious causal graphs.

Bio: Dr. Hengrui Cai is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Statistics at the University of California Irvine. She obtained her Ph.D. degree in Statistics at North Carolina State University in 2022. Cai has broad research interests in methodology and theory in causal inference, reinforcement learning, and graphical modeling, to establish reliable, powerful, and interpretable solutions to real-world problems. Currently, her research focuses on causal inference and causal structure learning, and policy optimization and evaluation in reinforcement/deep learning. Her work has been published in conferences including ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, and IJCAI, as well as journals including the Journal of Machine Learning Research, Stat, and Statistics in Medicine.

The Baldi group will present ongoing progress in the theory and applications of deep learning. On the theory side, we will discuss homogeneous activation functions and their important connections to the concept of generalized neural balance. On the application side, we will present applications of neural transformers to physics, in particular for the assignment of observation measurements to the leaves of partial Feynman diagrams in particle physics. In these applications, the permutation invariance properties of transformers are used to capture fundamental symmetries (e.g. matter vs antimatter) in the laws of physics.

Bio: Pierre Baldi earned M.S. degrees in mathematics and psychology from the University of Paris, France, in 1980, and the Ph.D. degree in mathematics from the Caltech, CA, USA, in 1986. He is currently a Distinguished Professor with the Department of Computer Science, Director with the Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, and Associate Director with the Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems at the University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. His research interests include understanding intelligence in brains and machines. He has made several contributions to the theory of deep learning, and developed and applied deep learning methods for problems in the natural sciences. He has written 4 books and over 300 peer-reviewed articles. Dr. Baldi was the recipient of the 1993 Lew Allen Award at JPL, the 2010 E. R. Caianiello Prize for research in machine learning, and a 2014 Google Faculty Research Award. He is an Elected Fellow of the AAAS, AAAI, IEEE, ACM, and ISCB Alexander Shmakov is a Ph.D. student in the Baldi research group who loves everything deep learning and robotics. He has published papers on applications of deep learning to planning, robotic control, high energy physics, astronomy, chemical synthesis, and biology.

Many expect that AI will go from powering chatbots to providing mental health services. That it will go from advertisement to deciding who is given bail. The expectation is that AI will solve society’s problems by simply being more intelligent than we are. Implicit in this bullish perspective is the assumption that AI will naturally learn to reason from data: that it can form trains of thought that “make sense”, similar to how a mental health professional or judge might reason about a case, or more formally, how a mathematician might prove a theorem. This talk will investigate the question whether this behavior can be learned from data, and how we can design the next generation of AI techniques that can achieve such capabilities, focusing on neuro-symbolic learning and tractable deep generative models.

Bio: Guy Van den Broeck is an Associate Professor and Samueli Fellow at UCLA, in the Computer Science Department, where he directs the StarAI lab. His research interests are in Machine Learning, Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, and Artificial Intelligence in general. His papers have been recognized with awards from key conferences such as AAAI, UAI, KR, OOPSLA, and ILP. Guy is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award, a Sloan Fellowship, and the IJCAI-19 Computers and Thought Award.

Variational autoencoders (VAEs) have proven to be an effective approach to modeling complex data distributions while providing compact representations that can be interpretable and useful for downstream prediction tasks. In this work we train variational autoencoders with the dual goals of good likelihood-based generative modeling and good discriminative performance in supervised and semi-supervised prediction tasks. We show that the dominant approach to training semi-supervised VAEs has key weaknesses: it is fragile as model capacity increases; it is slow due to marginalization over labels; and it incoherently decouples into separate discriminative and generative models when all data is labeled. Our novel framework for semi-supervised VAE training uses a more coherent architecture and an objective that maximizes generative likelihood subject to prediction quality constraints. To handle cases when labels are very sparse, we further enforce a consistency constraint, derived naturally from the generative model, that requires predictions on reconstructed data to match those on the original data. Our approach enables advances in generative modeling to be incorporated by semi-supervised classifiers, which we demonstrate by augmenting deep generative models with latent variables corresponding to spatial transformations and by introducing a “very deep'” prediction-constrained VAE with many layers of latent variables. Our experiments show that prediction and consistency constraints improve generative samples as well as image classification performance in semi-supervised settings.

Bio: Gabe Hope is a final-year PhD student at UC Irvine working with professor Erik Sudderth. His research focuses on deep generative models, interpretable machine learning and semi-supervised learning. This fall he will join the faculty at Harvey Mudd College as a visiting assistant professor in computer science.

Lack of explainability is a key factor limiting the practical adoption of high-performant Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) controllers in systems environments. Explainable RL for networking hitherto used salient input features to interpret a controller’s behavior. However, these feature-based solutions do not completely explain the controller’s decision-making process. Often, operators are interested in understanding the impact of a controller’s actions on performance in the future, which feature-based solutions cannot capture. In this talk, I will present CrystalBox, a framework that explains a controller’s behavior in terms of the future impact on key network performance metrics. CrystalBox employs a novel learning-based approach to generate succinct and expressive explanations. We use reward components of the DRL network controller, which are key performance metrics meaningful to operators, as the basis for explanations. I will finally present three practical use cases of CrystalBox: cross-state explainability, guided reward design, and network observability.

Bio: Sangeetha Abdu Jyothi is an Assistant Professor in the Computer Science department at the University of California, Irvine. Her research interests lie at the intersection of computer systems, networking, and machine learning. Prior to UCI, she completed her Ph.D. at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 2019 where she was advised by Brighten Godfrey and had a brief stint as a postdoc at VMware Research. She is currently an Affiliated Researcher at VMware Research. She leads the Networking, Systems, and AI Lab (NetSAIL) at UCI. Her current research focus revolves around: Internet and Cloud Resilience, and Systems and Machine Learning.

Many researchers have pondered the same existential questions since the release of ChatGPT: Is scale really all you need? Will the future of machine learning rely exclusively on foundation models? Should we all drop our current research agenda and work on the next large language model instead? In this talk, I will try to make the case that the answer to all these questions should be a convinced “no” and that now, maybe more than ever, should be the time to focus on fundamental questions in machine learning again. I will provide evidence for this by presenting three modern use cases of Bayesian deep learning in the areas of self-supervised learning, interpretable additive modeling, and sequential decision making. Together, these will show that the research field of Bayesian deep learning is very much alive and thriving and that its potential for valuable real-world impact is only just unfolding.

Bio: Vincent Fortuin is a tenure-track research group leader at Helmholtz AI in Munich, leading the group for Efficient Learning and Probabilistic Inference for Science (ELPIS). He is also a Branco Weiss Fellow. His research focuses on reliable and data-efficient AI approaches leveraging Bayesian deep learning, deep generative modeling, meta-learning, and PAC-Bayesian theory. Before that, he did his PhD in Machine Learning at ETH Zürich and was a Research Fellow at the University of Cambridge. He is a member of ELLIS, a regular reviewer for all major machine learning conferences, and a co-organizer of the Symposium on Advances in Approximate Bayesian Inference (AABI) and the ICBINB initiative.

Corporate research labs aim to push the scientific and technological forefront of innovation outside traditional academia. Snap Inc. combines academia and industry by hiring academic researchers and doing application-driven research. In this talk I will give examples of research projects from my corporate research experience. My goal is to showcase the value of – and hurdles for – working both with and within corporate research labs, and how some of these values and hurdles are different from working in traditional academia.

Bio: Maarten Bos is a Lead Research Scientist at Snap Inc. After receiving his PhD in The Netherlands and postdoctoral training at Harvard University, he led a behavioral science group at Disney Research before joining Snap in 2018. His research interests range from decision science, to persuasion, and human-technology interaction. His work has been published in journals such as Science, Psychological Science, and the Journal of Marketing Research, and has been covered by the Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, and The New York Times.

While it’s common for other machine learning modalities to benefit from model pretraining, reinforcement learning (RL) agents still typically learn tabula rasa. Large language models (LLMs), trained on internet text, have been used as external knowledge sources for RL, but, on their own, they are noisy and lack the grounding necessary to reason in interactive environments. In this talk, we will cover methods for grounding LLMs in environment dynamics and applying extracted knowledge to training RL agents. Finally, we will demonstrate our newly proposed method for applying LLMs to improving RL sample efficiency through guided exploration. By applying LLMs to guiding exploration rather than using them as planners at execution time, our method remains robust to errors in LLM output while also grounding LLM knowledge in environment dynamics.

Bio: Kolby Nottingham is a PhD student at the University of California Irvine where he is coadvized by Professors Roy Fox and Sameer Singh. Kolby’s research interests lie at the intersection of reinforcement learning and natural language processing. His research applies recent advances in large language models to improving sequential decision making techniques.

Bayesian optimal experimental design is a sub-field of statistics focused on developing methods to make efficient use of experimental resources. Any potential design is evaluated in terms of a utility function, such as the (theoretically well-justified) expected information gain (EIG); unfortunately however, under most circumstances the EIG is intractable to evaluate. In this talk we build off of successful variational approaches, which optimize a parameterized variational model with respect to bounds on the EIG. Past work focused on learning a new variational model from scratch for each new design considered. Here we present a novel neural architecture that allows experimenters to optimize a single variational model that can estimate the EIG for potentially infinitely many designs. To further improve computational efficiency, we also propose to train the variational model on a significantly cheaper-to-evaluate lower bound, and show empirically that the resulting model provides an excellent guide for more accurate, but expensive to evaluate bounds on the EIG. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique on generalized linear models, a class of statistical models that is widely used in the analysis of controlled experiments. Experiments show that our method is able to greatly improve accuracy over existing approximation strategies, and achieve these results with far better sample efficiency.

Bio: Noble Kennamer recently completed his PhD at UC Irvine under Alexander Ihler, where he worked on variational methods for optimal experimental design and applications of machine learning to the physical sciences. In March he will be starting as a Research Scientist at Netflix.

Competence is the ability to do something well. Competence awareness is the ability to represent and learn a model of self competence and use it to decide how to best use the agent’s own abilities as well as any available human assistance. This capability is critical for the success and safety of autonomous systems that operate in the open world. In this talk, I introduce two types of competence-aware systems (CAS), namely Type I and Type II CAS. The former refers to a stand-alone system that can learn its own competence and use it to fine-tune itself to the characteristics of the problem instance at hand, without human assistance. The latter is a human-aware system that can uses a self-competence model to optimize the utilization of costly human assistive actions. I describe recent results that demonstrate the benefits of the two types of competence awareness in different contexts, including autonomous vehicle decision making.

Bio: Shlomo Zilberstein is Professor of Computer Science and Associate Dean for Research and Engagement in the Manning College of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He received a B.A. in Computer Science from the Technion, and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the UC Berkeley. Zilberstein’s research focuses on the foundations and applications of resource-bounded reasoning techniques, which allow complex systems to make decisions while coping with uncertainty, missing information, and limited computational resources. His research interests include decision theory, reasoning under uncertainty, Markov decision processes, design of autonomous agents, heuristic search, real-time problem solving, principles of meta-reasoning, planning and scheduling, multi-agent systems, and reinforcement learning. Zilberstein is a Fellow of AAAI and the ACM. He is recipient of the University of Massachusetts Chancellor’s Medal (2019), the IFAAMAS Influential Paper Award (2019), the AAAI Distinguished Service Award (2019), a National Science Foundation CAREER Award (1996), and the Israel Defense Prize (1992). He received numerous Paper Awards from AAAI (2017,2021), IJCAI (2020), AAMAS (2003), ECAI (1998), ICAPS (2010), and SoCS (2022) among others. He is the past Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, former Chair of the AAAI Conference Committee, former President of ICAPS, a former Councilor of AAAI, and the Chairman of the AI Access Foundation.

With the burgeoning use of machine learning models in an assortment of applications, there is a need to rapidly and reliably deploy models in a variety of environments. These trustworthy machine learning models must satisfy certain criteria, namely the ability to: (i) adapt and generalize to previously unseen worlds although trained on data that only represent a subset of the world, (ii) allow for non-iid data, (iii) be resilient to (adversarial) perturbations, and (iv) conform to social norms and make ethical decisions. In this talk, towards trustworthy and generally applicable intelligent systems, I will cover some reinforcement learning algorithms that achieve fast adaptation by guaranteed knowledge transfer, principled methods that measure the vulnerability and improve the robustness of reinforcement learning agents, and ethical models that make fair decisions under distribution shifts.

Bio: Furong Huang is an Assistant Professor of the Department of Computer Science at University of Maryland. She works on statistical and trustworthy machine learning, reinforcement learning, graph neural networks, deep learning theory and federated learning with specialization in domain adaptation, algorithmic robustness and fairness. Furong is a recipient of the NSF CRII Award, the MLconf Industry Impact Research Award, the Adobe Faculty Research Award, and three JP Morgan Faculty Research Awards. She is a Finalist of AI in Research – AI researcher of the year for Women in AI Awards North America 2022. She received her Ph.D. in electrical engineering and computer science from UC Irvine in 2016, after which she completed postdoctoral positions at Microsoft Research NYC.

The use of artificial intelligence in knowledge-seeking applications (e.g., for recommendations and explanations) has shown remarkable effectiveness. However, the increasing demand for more interactions, accessibility and user-friendliness in these systems requires the underlying components (dialog models, LLMs) to be adequately grounded in the up-to-date real-world context. However, in reality, even powerful generative models often lack commonsense, explanations, and subjectivity — a long-standing goal of artificial general intelligence. In this talk, I will partly address these problems in three parts and hint at future possibilities and social impacts. Mainly, I will discuss: 1) methods to effectively inject up-to-date knowledge in an existing dialog model without any additional training, 2) the role of background knowledge in generating faithful natural language explanations, and 3) a conversational framework to address subjectivity—balancing task performance and bias mitigation for fair interpretable predictions.

Bio: Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder is a final-year PhD student at CSE, UC San Diego, advised by Prof. Julian McAuley. His research goal is to build interactive machines capable of producing knowledge grounded explanations. He previously interned at Allen Institute of AI, Google AI, Microsoft Research, FAIR (Meta AI) and collaborated with U of Oxford, U of British Columbia, and Alan Turing Institute. He is a recipient of the UCSD CSE Doctoral Award for Research (2022), Adobe Research Fellowship (2022), UCSD Friends Fellowship (2022), and Qualcomm Innovation Fellowship (2020). In 2019, Bodhi led UCSD in the finals of Amazon Alexa Prize. He also co-authored a best-selling NLP book with O’Reilly Media that is being adopted in universities internationally. Website: http://www.majumderb.com/.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning models are being increasingly deployed in real-world applications. In many of these applications, there is strong motivation to develop hybrid systems in which humans and AI algorithms can work together, leveraging their complementary strengths and weaknesses. In the first part of the presentation, I will discuss results from a Bayesian framework where we statistically combine the predictions from humans and machines while taking into account the unique ways human and algorithmic confidence is expressed. The framework allows us to investigate the factors that influence complementarity, where a hybrid combination of human and machine predictions leads to better performance than combinations of human or machine predictions alone. In the second part of the presentation, I will discuss some recent work on AI-assisted decision making where individuals are presented with recommended predictions from classifiers. Using a cognitive modeling approach, we can estimate the AI reliance policy used by individual participants. The results show that AI advice is more readily adopted if the individual is in a low confidence state, receives high-confidence advice from the AI and when the AI is generally more accurate. In the final part of the presentation, I will discuss the question of “machine theory of mind” and “theory of machine”, how humans and machines can efficiently form mental models of each other. I will show some recent results on theory-of-mind experiments where the goal is for individuals and machine algorithms to predict the performance of other individuals in image classification tasks. The results show performance gaps where human individuals outperform algorithms in mindreading tasks. I will discuss several research directions designed to close the gap.

Bio: Mark Steyvers is a Professor of Cognitive Science at UC Irvine and Chancellor’s Fellow. He has a joint appointment with the Computer Science department and is affiliated with the Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems. His publications span work in cognitive science as well as machine learning and has been funded by NSF, NIH, IARPA, NAVY, and AFOSR. He received his PhD from Indiana University and was a Postdoctoral Fellow at Stanford University. He is currently serving as Associate Editor of Computational Brain and Behavior and Consulting Editor for Psychological Review and has previously served as the President of the Society of Mathematical Psychology, Associate Editor for Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and the Journal of Mathematical Psychology. In addition, he has served as a consultant for a variety of companies such as eBay, Yahoo, Netflix, Merriam Webster, Rubicon and Gimbal on machine learning problems. Dr. Steyvers received New Investigator Awards from the American Psychological Association as well as the Society of Experimental Psychologists. He also received an award from the Future of Privacy Forum and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for his collaborative work with Lumosity.

In reasoning about sequential events it is natural to pose probabilistic queries such as “when will event A occur next” or “what is the probability of A occurring before B”, with applications in areas such as user modeling, medicine, and finance. However, with machine learning shifting towards neural autoregressive models such as RNNs and transformers, probabilistic querying has been largely restricted to simple cases such as next-event prediction. This is in part due to the fact that future querying involves marginalization over large path spaces, which is not straightforward to do efficiently in such models. In this talk, we will describe a novel representation of querying for these discrete sequential models, as well as discuss various approximation and search techniques that can be utilized to help estimate these probabilistic queries. Lastly, we will briefly touch on ongoing work that has extended these techniques into sequential models for continuous time events.

Bio: Alex Boyd is a Statistics PhD candidate at UC Irvine, co-advised by Padhraic Smyth and Stephan Mandt. His work focuses on improving probabilistic methods, primarily for deep sequential models. He was selected in 2020 as a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellow.

We live in an era of data deluge, where pervasive media collect massive amounts of data, often in a streaming fashion. Learning from these dynamic and large volumes of data is hence expected to bring significant science and engineering advances along with consequent improvements in quality of life. However, with the blessings come big challenges. The sheer volume of data makes it impossible to run analytics in batch form. Large-scale datasets are noisy, incomplete, and prone to outliers. As many sources continuously generate data in real-time, it is often impossible to store all of it. Thus, analytics must often be performed in real-time, without a chance to revisit past entries. In response to these challenges, this talk will first introduce an online scalable function approximation scheme that is suitable for various machine learning tasks. The novel approach adaptively learns and tracks the sought nonlinear function ‘on the fly’ with quantifiable performance guarantees, even in adversarial environments with unknown dynamics. Building on this robust and scalable function approximation framework, a scalable online learning approach with graph feedback will be outlined next for online learning with possibly related models. The effectiveness of the novel algorithms will be showcased in several real-world datasets.

Bio: Yanning Shen is an assistant professor with the EECS department at the University of California, Irvine. She received her Ph.D. degree from the University of Minnesota (UMN) in 2019. She was a finalist for the Best Student Paper Award at the 2017 IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing, and the 2017 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. She was selected as a Rising Star in EECS by Stanford University in 2017. She received the Microsoft Academic Grant Award for AI Research in 2021, the Google Research Scholar Award in 2022, and the Hellman Fellowship in 2022. Her research interests span the areas of machine learning, network science, data science, and signal processing.

Information extraction (IE) is the process of automatically inducing structures of concepts and relations described in natural language text. It is the fundamental task to assess the machine’s ability for natural language understanding, as well as the essential step for acquiring structural knowledge representation that is integral to any knowledge-driven AI systems. Despite the importance, obtaining direct supervision for IE tasks is always very difficult, as it requires expert annotators to read through long documents and identify complex structures. Therefore, a robust and accountable IE model has to be achievable with minimal and imperfect supervision. Towards this mission, this talk covers recent advances of machine learning and inference technologies that (i) grant robustness against noise and perturbation, (ii) prevent systematic errors caused by spurious correlations, and (iii) provide indirect supervision for label-efficient and logically consistent IE.

Bio: Muhao Chen is an Assistant Research Professor of Computer Science at USC, and the director of the USC Language Understanding and Knowledge Acquisition (LUKA) Lab. His research focuses on robust and minimally supervised machine learning for natural language understanding, structured data processing, and knowledge acquisition from unstructured data. His work has been recognized with an NSF CRII Award, faculty research awards from Cisco and Amazon, an ACM SIGBio Best Student Paper Award and a best paper nomination at CoNLL. Dr. Chen obtained his Ph.D. degree from UCLA Department of Computer Science in 2019, and was a postdoctoral researcher at UPenn prior to joining USC.

Consider a large random structure — a random graph, a stochastic process on the line, a random field on the grid — and a function that depends only on a small part of the structure. Now use a family of transformations to ‘move’ the domain of the function over the structure, collect each function value, and average. Under suitable conditions, the law of large numbers generalizes to such averages; that is one of the deep insights of modern ergodic theory. My own recent work with Morgane Austern (Harvard) shows that central limit theorems and other higher-order properties also hold. Loosely speaking, if the i.i.d. assumption of classical statistics is substituted by suitable properties formulated in terms of groups, the fundamental theorems of inference still hold.

Bio: Peter Orbanz is a Professor of Machine Learning in the Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit at University College London. He studies large systems of dependent variables in machine learning and inference problems. That involves symmetry and group invariance properties, such as exchangeability and stationarity, random graphs and random structures, hierarchies of latent variables, and the intersection of ergodic theory and statistical physics with statistics and machine learning. In the past, Peter was a PhD student of Joachim M. Buhmann at ETH Zurich, a postdoc with Zoubin Ghahramani at the University of Cambridge, and Assistant and Associate Professor in the Department of Statistics at Columbia University.

The Bayesian treatment of neural networks dictates that a prior distribution is specified over their weight and bias parameters. This poses a challenge because modern neural networks are characterized by a huge number of parameters and non-linearities. The choice of these priors has an unpredictable effect on the distribution of the functional output which could represent a hugely limiting aspect of Bayesian deep learning models. Differently, Gaussian processes offer a rigorous non-parametric framework to define prior distributions over the space of functions. In this talk, we aim to introduce a novel and robust framework to impose such functional priors on modern neural networks for supervised learning tasks through minimizing the Wasserstein distance between samples of stochastic processes. In addition, we extend this framework to carry out model selection for Bayesian autoencoders for unsupervised learning tasks. We provide extensive experimental evidence that coupling these priors with scalable Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling offers systematically large performance improvements over alternative choices of priors and state-of-the-art approximate Bayesian deep learning approaches.

Bio: Maurizio Filippone received a Master’s degree in Physics and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Genova, Italy, in 2004 and 2008, respectively. In 2007, he was a Research Scholar with George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. From 2008 to 2011, he was a Research Associate with the University of Sheffield, U.K. (2008-2009), with the University of Glasgow, U.K. (2010), and with University College London, U.K (2011). From 2011 to 2015 he was a Lecturer at the University of Glasgow, U.K, and he is currently AXA Chair of Computational Statistics and Associate Professor at EURECOM, Sophia Antipolis, France. His current research interests include the development of tractable and scalable Bayesian inference techniques for Gaussian processes and Deep/Conv Nets with applications in life and environmental sciences.
Bio: Ba-Hien Tran is currently a PhD student within the Data Science department of EURECOM, under the supervision of Professor Maurizio Filippone. His research focuses on Accelerating Inference for Deep Probabilistic Modeling. In 2016, he received a Bachelor of Science degree with honors in Computer Science from Vietnam National University, HCMC. His thesis investigated Deep Learning approaches for data-driven image captioning. In 2020, he received a Master of Science in Engineering degree in Data Science from Télécom Paris. His thesis focused on Bayesian Inference for Deep Neural Networks.

Neural data compression has been shown to outperform classical methods in terms of rate-distortion performance, with results still improving rapidly. These models are fitted to a training dataset and cannot be expected to optimally compress test data in general due to limitations on model capacity, distribution shifts, and imperfect optimization. If the test-time data distribution is known and has relatively low entropy, the model can easily be finetuned or adapted to this distribution. Instance-adaptive methods take this approach to the extreme, adapting the model to a single test instance, and signaling the updated model along in the bitstream. In this talk, we will show the potential of different types of instance-adaptive methods and discuss the tradeoffs that these methods pose.

Bio: Ties is a senior machine learning researcher at Qualcomm AI Research. He obtained his masters’s degree at the University of Amsterdam with a thesis on personalizing automatic speech recognition systems using unsupervised methods. At Qualcomm AI research he has been working on neural compression, with a focus on using generative models to compress image and video data. His research includes work on semantic compression and constrained optimization as well as instance-adaptive and neural-implicit compression.

Natural language processing (NLP) models have achieved impressive accuracies on in-distribution benchmarks, but they are unreliable in out-of-distribution (OOD) settings. In this talk, I will give an exclusive preview of my group’s ongoing work on evaluating and improving model performance in OOD settings. First, I will propose likelihood splits, a general-purpose way to create challenging non-i.i.d. benchmarks by measuring generalization to the tail of the data distribution, as identified by a language model. Second, I will describe the advantages of neurosymbolic approaches over end-to-end pretrained models for OOD generalization in visual question answering; these results highlight the importance of measuring OOD generalization when comparing modeling approaches. Finally, I will show how synthesized examples can improve open-set recognition, the task of abstaining on OOD examples that come from classes never seen at training time.

Bio: Robin Jia is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southern California. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from Stanford University, where he was advised by Percy Liang. He has also spent time as a visiting researcher at Facebook AI Research, working with Luke Zettlemoyer and Douwe Kiela. He is interested broadly in natural language processing and machine learning, with a particular focus on building NLP systems that are robust to distribution shift. Robin’s work has received best paper awards at ACL and EMNLP.

Computational protein design (CPD) is the task of creating new proteins to fulfill a desired function. In this talk, I will share work recently accepted at UAI 2022 based on a new formulation of CPD as a graphical model designed for optimizing subunit binding affinity. These new methods showed promising results when compared with state-of-the-art algorithm BBK* that is part of a long-time developed software package dedicated to CPD. In the talk, I will first describe CPD in general and for optimizing a quantity called K* (which approximates binding affinity). I will relate this to the well known task of MMAP for which many powerful algorithms have been recently developed and from which our methods are inspired. Next I will give a preview of the promising results of our new framework. I will then go on to describe the framework, presenting the formulation of the problem as a graphical model for K* optimization and introducing a weighted mini-bucket heuristic for bounding K* and guiding search. Finally, I will share our algorithm AOBB-K* and modifications that can enhance it, describing some of the empirical benefits and limitations of our scheme. To conclude, I will outline some future directions for advancing the use of this framework.

Bio: Bobak Pezeshki is a fifth year PhD student of Computer Science at the University of California, Irvine, under advisement of Professor Rina Dechter. His research focus is in automated reasoning over graphical models with focus in Abstraction Sampling and applying automated reasoning over graphical models to computational protein design. He completed his undergraduate studies at UC Berkeley majoring in Molecular and Cell Biology (with an emphasis in Biochemistry) and Integrative Biology. Before pursuing his PhD at UCI, he was involved in protein biochemistry research at the Stroud Lab, UCSF, and at Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics.

Ensemble methods for reinforcement learning have gained attention in recent years, due to their ability to represent model uncertainty and use it to guide exploration and to reduce value estimation bias. We present MeanQ, a very simple ensemble method with improved performance, and show how it reduces estimation variance enough to operate without a stabilizing target network. Curiously, MeanQ is theoretically *almost* equivalent to a non-ensemble state-of-the-art method that it significantly outperforms, raising questions about the interaction between uncertainty estimation, representation, and resampling.
In adversarial environments, where a second agent attempts to minimize the first’s rewards, double-oracle (DO) methods grow a population of policies for both agents by iteratively adding the best response to the current population. DO algorithms are guaranteed to converge when they exhaust all policies, but are only effective when they find a small population sufficient to induce a good agent. We present XDO, a DO algorithm that exploits the game’s sequential structure to exponentially reduce the worst-case population size. Curiously, the small population size that XDO needs to find good agents more than compensates for its increased difficulty to iterate with a given population size.

Bio: Roy Fox is an Assistant Professor and director of the Intelligent Dynamics Lab at the Department of Computer Science at UCI. He was previously a postdoc in UC Berkeley’s BAIR, RISELab, and AUTOLAB, where he developed algorithms and systems that interact with humans to learn structured control policies for robotics and program synthesis. His research interests include theory and applications of reinforcement learning, algorithmic game theory, information theory, and robotics. His current research focuses on structure, exploration, and optimization in deep reinforcement learning and imitation learning of virtual and physical agents and multi-agent systems.

Autonomous agents such as self-driving cars have already gained the capability to perform individual tasks such as object detection and lane following, especially in simple, static environments. While advancing robots towards full autonomy, it is important to minimize deleterious effects on humans and infrastructure to ensure the trustworthiness of such systems. However, for robots to safely operate in the real world, it is vital for them to quantify the multimodal aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty around them and use that uncertainty for decision-making. In this talk, I will talk about how we can leverage tools from approximate Bayesian inference, kernel methods, and deep neural networks to develop interpretable autonomous systems for high-stakes applications.

Bio: Ransalu Senanayake is a postdoctoral scholar in the Statistical Machine Learning Group at the Department of Computer Science, Stanford University. He focuses on making downstream applications of machine learning trustworthy by quantifying uncertainty and explaining the decisions of such systems. Currently, he works with Prof. Emily Fox and Prof. Carlos Guestrin. He also worked on decision-making under uncertainty with Prof. Mykel Kochenderfer. Prior to joining Stanford, Ransalu obtained a PhD in Computer Science from the University of Sydney, Australia, and an MPhil in Industrial Engineering and Decision Analytics from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.

For domain experts to adopt machine learning (ML) models in high-stakes settings such as health care and law, they must understand and trust model predictions. As a result, researchers have proposed numerous ways to explain the predictions of complex ML models. However, these approaches suffer from several critical drawbacks, such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, instability, inconsistency, and lack of guidance about accuracy and correctness. For practitioners to safely use explanations in the real world, it is vital to properly characterize the limitations of current techniques and develop improved explainability methods. This talk will describe the shortcomings of explanations and introduce current research demonstrating how they are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. I will also discuss promising solutions and present recent work on explanations that leverage uncertainty estimates to overcome several critical explanation shortcomings.

Bio: Dylan Slack is a Ph.D. candidate at UC Irvine advised by Sameer Singh and Hima Lakkaraju and associated with UCI NLP, CREATE, and the HPI Research Center. His research focuses on developing techniques that help researchers and practitioners build more robust, reliable, and trustworthy machine learning models. In the past, he has held research internships at GoogleAI and Amazon AWS and was previously an undergraduate at Haverford College advised by Sorelle Friedler where he researched fairness in machine learning.

Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a popular choice for modeling sequential data. Standard RNNs assume constant time-intervals between observations. However, in many datasets (e.g. medical records) observation times are irregular and can carry important information. To address this challenge, we propose continuous recurrent units (CRUs) – a neural architecture that can naturally handle irregular intervals between observations. The CRU assumes a hidden state which evolves according to a linear stochastic differential equation and is integrated into an encoder-decoder framework. The recursive computations of the CRU can be derived using the continuous-discrete Kalman filter and are in closed form. The resulting recurrent architecture has temporal continuity between hidden states and a gating mechanism that can optimally integrate noisy observations. We derive an efficient parametrization scheme for the CRU that leads to a fast implementation (f-CRU). We empirically study the CRU on a number of challenging datasets and find that it can interpolate irregular time series better than methods based on neural ordinary differential equations.

Bio: Maja Rudolph is a Senior Research Scientist at the Bosch Center for AI where she works on machine learning research questions derived from engineering problems: for example, how to model driving behavior, how to forecast the operating conditions of a device, or how to find anomalies in the sensor data of an assembly line. In 2018, Maja completed her Ph.D. in Computer Science at Columbia University, advised by David Blei. She holds a MS in Electrical Engineering from Columbia University and a BS in Mathematics from MIT.

Energy-based models (EBMs) are an appealing class of probabilistic models, which can be viewed as generative versions of discriminators, yet can be learned from unlabeled data. Despite a number of desirable properties, two challenges remain for training EBMs on high-dimensional datasets. First, learning EBMs by maximum likelihood requires Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to generate samples from the model, which can be extremely expensive. Second, the energy potentials learned with non-convergent MCMC can be highly biased, making it difficult to evaluate the learned energy potentials or apply the learned models to downstream tasks.
In this talk, I will present two algorithms to tackle the challenges of training EBMs. (1) Diffusion Recovery Likelihood, where we tractably learn and sample from a sequence of EBMs trained on increasingly noisy versions of a dataset. Each EBM is trained with recovery likelihood, which maximizes the conditional probability of the data at a certain noise level given their noisy versions at a higher noise level. (2) Flow Contrastive Estimation, where we jointly estimate an EBM and a flow-based model, in which the two models are iteratively updated based on a shared adversarial value function. We demonstrate that EBMs can be trained with a small budget of MCMC or completely without MCMC. The learned energy potentials are faithful and can be applied to likelihood evaluation and downstream tasks, such as feature learning and semi-supervised learning.

Bio: Ruiqi Gao is a research scientist at Google, Brain team. Her research interests are in statistical modeling and learning, with a focus on generative models and representation learning. She received her Ph.D. degree in statistics from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in 2021 advised by Song-Chun Zhu and Ying Nian Wu. Prior to that, she received her bachelor’s degree from Peking University. Her recent research themes include scalable training algorithms of deep generative models, variational inference, and representational models with implications in neuroscience.

Large language models are commonly used in different paradigms of natural language processing and machine learning, and are known for their efficiency as well as their overall lack of interpretability. Their data driven approach for emulating human language often results in human biases being encoded and even amplified, potentially leading to cyclic propagation of representational and allocational harm. We discuss in this talk some aspects of detecting, evaluating, and mitigating biases and associated harms in a holistic, inclusive, and culturally-aware manner. In particular, we discuss the disparate impact on society of common language tools that are not inclusive of all gender identities.

Bio: Sunipa Dev is a Research Scientist on the Ethical AI team at Google AI. Previously, she was an NSF Computing Innovation Fellow at UCLA, before which she completed her PhD at the University of Utah. Her ongoing research focuses on various facets of fairness and interpretability in NLP, including robust measurements of bias, cross-cultural understanding of concepts in NLP, and inclusive language representations.

Predicting cancer from XRays seemed great
Until we discovered the true reason.
The model, in its glory, did fixate
On radiologist markings – treason!

We found the issue with attribution:
By blaming pixels for the prediction (1,2,3,4,5,6).
A complement’ry way to attribute,
is to pay training data, a tribute (1).

If you are int’rested in FTC,
counterfactual theory, SGD
Or Shapley values and fine kernel tricks,
Please come attend, unless you have conflicts

Should you build deep models down the road,
Use attributions. Takes ten lines of code!

Bio:
There once was an RS called MS,
The models he studies are a mess,
A director at Google.
Accurate and frugal,
Explanations are what he likes best.